![]() ![]()
Its name is Krita in actual version 4.4.1, I just began work with it, and it's definitely better than Photoshop from about ten years ago (when I used it last time, so I'm not able to compare it with the actual version of PS). But in this interconnected world, it is becoming more difficult.Īfter almost 10 years of your question there is a new free, modern, multiplatform player with much more features than GIMP. ![]() It is better for everyone that we have competition. On some other areas, like digital painting, there are a lot of alternatives rather than PS, like Corel Painter, Krita, Sai, etc. On the "Open Source" world, the most prominent program is Blender for animations, compositing, besides the obvious 3D. The new kid on the block is Affinity Designer and Affinity Photo. ![]() I still have a copy of PS for very specific stuff, but I use it less than once a month. Even some adjustments that could be done on PS I do them inside Corel Draw. I use Corel Draw since forever and in some have some nicer features than AI. But I should say that it is totally suitable to divorce from Adobe. My question is with regards to the possibility of fully divorcing from Adobe's solutions and still being able to function as a graphic design studio.įor a "professional" studio, Inkscape and Gimp are probably too limited even now. Inkscape review or illustrator pdf#If the workflow is somehow closed, or you use general files types (Like PNG, JPG and TIF for photo images) you are fine using different programs.Ĭompatibility has increased a bit more after the years, and the usage of output formats like PDF is more solid now than a decade ago.Ī specific scenario where is totally suitable to use Open Source programs is in Institutions, where you can have a "Communications Department", elementary schools, etc and you need to use the software on several computers. This is probably the main reason people do not choose another platform and this applies to a lot of things, for example, social media. The first point to consider is the ecosystem the designer lives in.Īn obvious reason not to choose different applications is if it has a strong dependency on external assets. This is an oldie, but I'll add my 2 cents. If my main job was graphic design I would definitely get Photoshop as soon as I can (maybe do a few small projects with GIMP so I can afford it). Inkscape review or illustrator professional#So it all boils down to how much money, quality and your time's worth - if you only do simple work, GIMP can do well or you are an hobbyist and your time is essentially free then you can't compete with GIMP's price - but if you need a powerful tool and your time is expensive (and if you have any success as a professional graphic designer, then your time should be expensive) GIMP doesn't look so free anymore.Īnd that is without taking into account you might someday need some plugin that is only available for photoshop, need to exchange PSD files with other designers or hire employees and have to train them to use GIMP. Inkscape review or illustrator how to#Photoshop has more features, produces better results, has more plugins and virtually all graphic designers know how to use it - it's also very expensive.įor the same amount of work you will have better results in Photoshop - that means that if you use GIMP you will either produce lower quality work or need more time. GIMP and Inkscape are both very nice and quite powerful - but if you compare GIMP to photoshop its obvious GIMP is not on the same level (I've never used Illustrator so I can't compare it with Inkscape). I am not a graphic designer but I do some small graphics work occasionally and I use GIMP and Inkscape. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |